The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The provided line graph illustrates the data concerning the birth and death rates over the period of 2 centuries starting from 1901 to 2101 in New Zealand.
A glance of the graph reveals that the rate of birth is much higher than that of death. However, over the last half century shown in the illustration is assessed to bring staggering alternation of dominant position of the death rate, which is apparently seen that the birth rate is forecasted to be surpassed by the mortality one from 2041 onwards.
As is presented in the line graph, in 1901 the birth accounted for the higher proportion with around 20000, which is twice as much as the death did. The amount of people who were born in New Zealand witnessed a fluctuation in the first-60-year before reaching a peak at approximately 67000 in 1961 . The data source clearly communicates that between 1961 and 2021 these numbers have experienced a variation and stopped at just over 50000 in 2021, which is projected to be followed by a notable decline to nearly 40000 till the end of the 21 th century.
Regarding to the mortality rate, it stood at below 10000 at the start of the period. There was a mild volatility on the percentage of citizens passing away in New Zealand from 1901 to 2001. Nevertheless, the figures for the death are expected to go through a substantial growth from roughly 30000 in 2001 to 50000 in 2041. In all probability, 2041 will be the era that the lethality rate will overtake the position of the birth one at well under 50000. This proportion will continue to go up consistently to reach the highest point at about 60000 in 2061 before almost leveling off till the end of the given span.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided line graph illustrates the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t half century shown in the illustration is assessed to bring staggering alternat...
^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...presented in the line graph, in 1901 the birth accounted for the higher proportio...
^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng a peak at approximately 67000 in 1961 . The data source clearly communicates th...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of citizens passing away in New Zealand from 1901 to 2001. Nevertheless, the fig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, nevertheless, regarding, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 33.7804878049 198% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6531986532 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66019984463 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 106.607317073 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.553562866 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.636363636 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190987489925 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806988480093 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616694788142 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137231986377 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562894753565 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.