Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this situation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
specialties. Along these lines, some cutting edge specialists get immense aggregates of cash for their centerpieces, while others battle to endure. In my view, Governments reserve no privileges to determine this out of line circumstance.
For the most part, a fine art cost extensively relies on the visual impression of buyers. A culture vulture addresses a significant expense for an artwork chiefly neither for their uniqueness nor their aestheticity. This framework the motivation behind why a few show-stoppers are more commendable than the others. Besides, the worth difference of a work of art runs differently from the substance to the craftsman's methods, which makes it harder at the cost fixing understandings. I accept there is no way around this.
Likewise, a work of art is exceptionally assessed all things considered as a result of the craftsman's status. In this way, they should invest energy buckling down, climbing in their bearer stepping stool, picking up notoriety and raising their costs after some time. This may appear to be discriminatory for who stay obscure, however in the event that they pick this transporter, they should acknowledge reality. For what reason would the Governments under,ine their relentless dedication and surpress their wellspring of salary ?
Eventually, while their is imbalance of costs exists in the craftsmanship network, there is no ther ways for the ones who are in persuit of workmanship field. In like manner, it is a lacking benefit for the Governments to tackle this circumstance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Specialties
specialties. Along these lines, some cutting edge s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ine
... what reason would the Governments under,ine their relentless dedication and surpres...
^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...pring of salary ? Eventually, while their is imbalance of costs exists in the cra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, likewise, may, so, well, while, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15134620991 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662551440329 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0453636704 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.384615385 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183125046375 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631827268613 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038884149241 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112158163833 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418074847157 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.