Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this unfair situation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the authorities should take measures to tackle the inequality between artists who can accumulate a huge amount of money for their creation and those striving to make ends meet. In my opinion, I only partly agree with that statement because ultimately, artists should be responsible for their own career.
On the one hand, the huge gap in incomes, specifically artists’, should be solved. This wealth inequality is one of the global issues that every government is striving to clear up so that they can maintain career diversity and equal development in their countries. If there is no suitable solution, the potential novice artists may end up switching to another job with a more stable income. In fact, many governments are granting subsidies and policies to preserve traditional arts from which little money could be earned.
On the other hand, every artist has an equal chance. The ones that earn more fortunately possess a style that can satisfy the majority of the population, which makes their niche wider. However, artists whose niche is narrower can also reach more potential prospects if they are assisted by a good marketing team with good marketing strategies. To exemplify, not until the current time have raps in Vietnam spreaded more wildly than ever. They seem to be dominating the music charts and advertisements thanks to the popularity of the two new rap shows.
In conclusion, there are undoubtedly certain artists needing governmental support to keep maintaining the creativity or paramount values of their cultures. However, artists should also genuinely strive to be outstanding and reach as many customers as possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2156133829 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79546488077 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631970260223 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7652355712 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15176190682 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538307839718 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388756401627 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946384164676 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431443667411 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.