Some modern artists receive huge sums of money for the things they create, while others struggle to survive. Governments should take steps to resolve this situation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about the value of arts and crafts. Thus, some modern artists receive huge sums of money for their works of art, while others struggle to survive. In my view, Governments have no rights to resolve this unfair situation.
Generally, an artwork price considerably hinges on the visual perception of purchasers. A culture vulture pays a high price for a painting mainly neither for their uniqueness nor their aestheticity. This outline the reason why some works of art are more worthy than the others. Furthermore, the value disparity of an artwork ranges variously from the content to the artist's techniques, which makes it harder for the price-fixing agreements. I believe there is nothing Governments can or should do about this.
What is more, an artwork is highly evaluated by and large just because of the artist's status. Thus, they are supposed to spend time working hard, moving up in their carrier ladder, gaining reputation and raising their prices over time. This may seem inequitable for who remain unknown, but if they choose this carrier, they must accept the truth. Why would the Governments under,ine their persistent devotion and surpress their source of income ?
Ultimately, while their is inequality of prices exists in the art community, there is no ther ways for the ones who are in persuit of art field. Likewise, it is an insufficient privilege for the Governments to solve this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People have different views about the va...
^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and crafts. Thus, some modern artists receive huge sums of money for their wor...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ghts to resolve this unfair situation. Generally, an artwork price considerab...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vernments can or should do about this. What is more, an artwork is highly ev...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...luated by and large just because of the artists status. Thus, they are supposed to spen...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ver time. This may seem inequitable for who remain unknown, but if they choose this...
^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ine
...e truth. Why would the Governments under,ine their persistent devotion and surpress ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and surpress their source of income ? Ultimately, while their is inequality...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... of income ? Ultimately, while their is inequality of prices exists in the a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, likewise, may, so, thus, while, by and large, in my view, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1313559322 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71203988167 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635593220339 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.136641494 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232935667452 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832264136152 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893266337301 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147771745955 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701178250469 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.