The graph below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in diffrent world regions.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph depicts the world population from 1800 to 2100, while the bar graph presents the the number of people in cities of the first and third world countries between 2005 and 2030. Overall, there was an increasing trend of the global populace and urban dwellers from the developing regions throughout the study period.
In the initial year of the survey, the number of the world citizens was at a billion people. This number increased more that twice than the base value after 150 years. Since then, there was a rapid growth in the global population and it is projected to peak at 9 billion individuals by 2050. This is eight folds more than the first figure recorded. However, the global population it expected to decline to 7 billion by the end of study.
Meanwhile, in 2005 the urban areas of the developing countries had more than 2 billion inhabitants, and gradually elevated by roughly one billion people after a decade. Moreover, these cities population is projected to double to 4 billion residents by 2030. On the other hand, the metropolis of developed regions had an initial figure of approximately 1.25 billion people. Similarly, this remained the same until 2015 and is expected to stay constant until the end of the study.
To infer, the urban communities had low population density in developed countries, and it is not expected to change for the next 25 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...0 to 2100, while the bar graph presents the the number of people in cities of the first...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...0 to 2100, while the bar graph presents the the number of people in cities of the first...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
... people after a decade. Moreover, these cities population is projected to double to 4 ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, similarly, then, third, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89029535865 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59604449614 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0940995607 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5833333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155745171425 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595868025452 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040125179096 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101641160164 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255533470705 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.