Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger however, others believe that it leads to environmental damages.
Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Many individuals argue that economic development is the answer to the increasing number of impoverished and starving people in the world. However, other people are of the opinion that the drive for economic growth have a destructive effect to the environment.
In the past decades industrialization has fueled the growth of economies of different countries.The rising number of new trades and industries opened opportunities for people to improve their standard of living. These has created jobs where people can work and have a steady income to allow them the ability to feed and provide for the family's needs.In addition, the growing economy also increases the national income of a country and will be able to support its poor citizen. The government have agricultural programs that awards the destitute people farm lands and livestock to grow for their own consumption and to generate income. For example, in India which is one of the fastest growing economy in the world, recently provided subsidized food and crops for millions of people in the country such as maize and coarse grain.
On the other hand, the success of a flourishing economy comes in the expense of the environment, one of which is environmental pollution. Industrial and manufacturing plants releases gases that causes air pollution causing various respiratory diseases. These complex also dumps waste in the bodies of water that kills marine life. Another drawback of economic growth is the destruction of the ecosystem. Many trees are cut down to be use as materials for the construction of infrastructures and houses. Some of the surviving rain forest and natural habitat are also destroyed for the expansion of cities and sites of new factories. According to an article more and more tropical forest are denuded in asia and africa because of industrialization.
In conclusion, economic growth will definitely help in solving poverty and hunger in the world by creating employments and through government initiatives. Nevertheless, I am of the opinion that economic development will be achieved even without compromising the environment through responsible use of resources and use of eco- friendly technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
...fect to the environment. In the past decades industrialization has fueled the growth...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...wth of economies of different countries.The rising number of new trades and industr...
^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... feed and provide for the familys needs.In addition, the growing economy also incr...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry such as maize and coarse grain. On the other hand, the success of a flou...
^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...truction of infrastructures and houses. Some of the surviving rain forest and natural habit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35260115607 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08655906649 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563583815029 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5500412133 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.466666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17422369919 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623311594056 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072350333639 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126922755577 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773225578796 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.