The United Nations International Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Decade was launched in 1980 to provide ' water sanitation for all by 1990' . The tables below show changes in water supply and sanitation levels during that decade.
Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the changes in water supply and sanitation in urban and rural areas between 1980 and 1990. To what extent did the UN achieve its aims?
The table gives information about the modification rate of the water system and sanitation in the rural and urban areas between the year 1980 and 1990. Overall, there was only minor changes on both the supply and level of potability of water in the cities after a decade.
In 1980, 70% of the urban districts had an access to water supply in which only a very minimal improvement was noted ten years after. On the other hand, the countryside only had approximately 25% of the area that had an access to water system, these was almost 50% less than that of the initial value of the towns. However, by the end of the study the number doubled from its original figure.
Moreover, the urban communities on the first year of the study had a water sanitation level of nearly 60% and by the year 1990 it slightly increased by roughly 2 %. Meanwhile, the suburban had only more than 10% clean drinking water in the year 1980, which was 50% less than that of the cities on the same year. by the end of the study no change was observe
In conclusion, the rural places had the lowest figures for availability of water source and access to safe drinking water. In addition, after the ten- year program of the United Nation, their was only partially met.
Comments
This is one of the best…
This is one of the best posts I've read on this forum. The information in the article helped me understand more about a new topic The Password Game that I had never known.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...In 1980, 70% of the urban districts had an access to water supply in which only a very mi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e countryside only had approximately 25% of the area that had an access to water ...
^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...approximately 25% of the area that had an access to water system, these was almost 50% l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...n that of the cities on the same year. by the end of the study no change was obse...
^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e end of the study no change was observe In conclusion, the rural places had the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56444444444 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3597183756 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515555555556 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7872793654 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278907488704 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126859782742 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703483942057 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1960750965 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074677939767 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.