The graph below shows the acid level in mouth from consumption of sugar and honey. Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values).
The described linear representation delineated the information about level of acid in mouth by consumption of sugar and honey also, the corrs of tooth decay was acid produced by eating sweet food. Acidity increases and pH level decreased which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, it is stated that Cane sugar was the main cause of increasing acidity in mouth as compared to other sources of sweet foods.
At the first glance, it is clear that after 5 minutes of eating fruit sugar level of acidity increased while it took 15 minutes to increased pH level in mouth. Moreover, pH level decreased in mouth by 4.5, 4.9 between five minutes of consumption of fruit sugar, respectively.
Moving further, tooth decay was likely to occur by consumptionof honey whereas, it took almost 15 minutes to come back to its original pH state. Moreover, fruit sugar and Cane sugar took 15 to 27 minutes to increase the pH level in the mouth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed while it took 15 minutes to increased pH level in mouth. Moreover, pH level d...
^^
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increased pH level in mouth. Moreover, pH level decreased in mouth by 4.5, 4.9 ...
^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e minutes of consumption of fruit sugar, respectively. Moving further, tooth dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89375 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70311596819 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51875 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2055190479 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438446247197 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232813344924 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10995291224 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293180291758 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136743534319 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.