The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, itlay and Australia between 1995 and 2005.
The given line graph represents the expenditure on books in four different countries (Germany, France, Italy and Australia ) from 1995 to 2005. The units are measured in US dollars in millions.
Overall, German spent much more money on books throughout the given period while the least amount of money was spent by australia at the beginning and Italy at the ending.
With regard to germany, the expenditure on books increased from 80 million dollars in 1995 to 90 millions in 1999 before dipping to well under 90 in 2003 which again claimed up to 95 millions in 2005. Similarly, the money spent by Italy first rose slightly to 55 millions in 1997 before declined to 50 in 1998 and then, it grew gradually to just over 60 millions in 2005.
In contrast, the total amount of money spent by france was around 50 million in 1995 which rose to about 75 at the end of year. Finally, australia spent 30 million us dollars on books in 1995 which went to 40 millions in 1999 and remained leveled off until 2001 then again rose significantly to over 70 million in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies Germany, France, Italy and Australia from 1995 to 2005. The units are measure...
^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are measured in US dollars in millions. Overall, German spent much more money on...
^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the beginning and Italy at the ending. With regard to germany, the expenditure ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ually to just over 60 millions in 2005. In contrast, the total amount of money s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, similarly, then, well, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58421052632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41592706866 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5587713749 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297445897811 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14295059941 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911403045998 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197634226755 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490929632077 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.