The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph gives the annual amount spent by tourists from five countries Australia, USA, UK, Japan and China, to visit New Zealand over the period of 1996 to 2014. The currency in which the amount has been measured is, New Zealand Dollars (NZ$).
The overall spend showed an increasing trend for every country at the end of 2014. The greatest amount was spent by Australian tourists at any point of time. The smallest value of expend belonged to Chinese visitors while the largest corresponded to the Australians.
During the timeline, the annual spends of the people from five countries fluctuated. In 1996, Australian tourists spent around 1000 NZ$ to visit New Zealand as compared to Chinese visitors, who shelled merely 50 NZ$. The expenditure of the tourists from USA, UK and Japan was around 400 NZ$, 450 NZ$ and 775 NZ$ respectively. The maximum amount ever disbursed to go New Zealand was 2300 NZ$, by Australians in 2006.
It is evident that Australian people spend most and the Chinese tourists spend least on a trip to New Zealand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-13 | phuongphuongt1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | phuongphuongt1234 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Renel Mosqueda Bacalso | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | mayankdhami | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | Nimasha | 80 | view |
- The table below gives information on the gender marital status and age of employees working in retail and manufacturing industries of a country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the US top ten processed food export markets 80
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period. 67
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...easured is, New Zealand Dollars NZ$. The overall spend showed an increasing tren...
^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d for every country at the end of 2014. The greatest amount was spent by Australian...
^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...stralian tourists at any point of time. The smallest value of expend belonged to Ch...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90502793296 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52100813934 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4264470904 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 5.23603664747 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19789279626 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855930114343 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604354446615 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127929421677 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262322399715 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.