The graph below shows average car carbon dioxide (CO2) per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart demonstrates the approximate amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in metric tonnes in the UK, Italy, Sweden, Portugal within 4 decades from 1967 to 2007.
It is clear that the amount of carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom and Sweden diminished after 40 years. On the other hand, the way of changing was different. CO2 emissions in the UK was reducing steadily during the whole period. However, in Sweden it was sharply increased after the first decade, but after it was diminishing the whole last period.
The situation in transforming the level of CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal was quite same. It was dramatically increased after the first decade. After it was still increasing in a period from 1977 to 1997, but the speed of changing was slower and was not permanent. Last ten years the amount of CO2 emissions was fluctuating.
Overall, the level of CO2 emissions in the four countries was quite different at the beginning of the period. But at the end, the differences between the four countries was not so huge and the level of CO2 emissions started to change from approximately six CO2 emissions in metric tonnes in Portugal and Sweden to 9 in the United Kingdom.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86956521739 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68191224144 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463768115942 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0344236442 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6363636364 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123658666528 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604447141764 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610307248775 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103830271536 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630256862755 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.