The graph below shows average carbon dioxide( CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide released by each people in four different countries from 1967 to 2007.
It can be seen from the graph, the average CO2 emission in the UK remained the biggest figure, whereas Portugal was the lowest one. Moreover, Italy and Portugal continued its upward trend during the whole period, but the United Kingdom steadily decreased. Specially, in the first two years, the amount CO2 in Sweden rose significantly but after that it dramatically fell down.
To begin with, the highest average carbon dioxide emission went on UK, the figure went up by over 8 metric tones. By contrast, Portugal had the smallest number of CO2 released that was under 6 metric tones. Although Sweden did not have excessively figure CO2 emission liked the United Kingdom, but it still reached to nearly 11 metric tones in 1977.
On the other hand, even though UK remained the most popular number during 1967-2007, but its trend dropped steadily, from 11 metric tones to 9 metric tones.Meanwile, Italy and Portugal increased noticeably, which was far more three times than the first period. Sweden had a fluctuated average amount carbon dioxide emission that rose considerably in between 1967 and 1977, then decreased sharply in the last period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'figured'.
Suggestion: figured
...lthough Sweden did not have excessively figure CO2 emission liked the United Kingdom, ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Meanwile
... from 11 metric tones to 9 metric tones.Meanwile, Italy and Portugal increased noticeabl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, still, then, whereas, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07619047619 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53876967721 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4592477927 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357806266454 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140624709741 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534475811105 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209467299623 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197921175614 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.