The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how much carbon dioxide was emitted on average in four European countries from 1967 to 2007 in ten-year intervals, measured in metric tonnes.
Overall, CO2 emissions in the UK and Sweden had a tendency to be downward while their Italy and Portugal counterparts experienced an opposite trend. It is also worth pointing out that British people released more CO2 in comparison with people in the other nations.
A quick glance at the chart reveals that at the beginning of the period, the amount of CO2 emitted by Italians was just above four metric tonnes, follow by the figure for Portuguese with about two metric tonnes lower. At the end, these quantities increased significantly to around 7.5 and 5.5 metric tonnes respectively.
Showing a contradictory pattern, in 1967, it is recorded that nearly 11 metric tonnes of CO2 were discharged by British people whereas that by Swedish residents was approximately nine metric tonnes. While the average CO2 emission in the UK then underwent a gradual drop, reaching below nine metric tonnes in 2007, that in Sweden rose noticeably before falling dramatically to just over five metric tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ically to just over five metric tonnes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18947368421 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73830426529 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626315789474 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8173872636 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148589238859 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702008727137 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476793392695 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925820094101 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045917111932 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.