The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the mean carbon dioxide extraction per individual in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, UK is top carbon releasing nation of all time followed by Italy, Sweden and Portugal till final year. UK and Sweden shows a declining pattern whereas Italy and Portugal follows uprising trend.
UK tops the chart of all time among the countries releasing carbon. The average emission of about 11 metric tons was recorded in 1967, however, the emission decreases gradually afterward to 9 metric tons in 2007. Sweden has a highly fluctuating emission pattern with 9 metric tons in 1967. The emission shoots up to 11 metric tons in 1977 and drops dramatically to 7 metric tons in 1987 and further declines to about 5 metric tons in the final year.
On the contrary, Italy and Portugal depicts a gradual increasing trend. Starting with a initial emission of just above 4 metric tons in 1967, Italy stands as the second largest carbon emitting nation, releasing just below 8 metric tons in the final year. Similarly, Portugal with a initial discharge of just below 2 metric tons, increases smoothly till 1997 to about 5 metric tons and shows steady discharge thereafter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gradual increasing trend. Starting with a initial emission of just above 4 metric...
^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he final year. Similarly, Portugal with a initial discharge of just below 2 metri...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, similarly, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98039215686 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54027534858 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2372961318 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19285169652 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099770551973 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676811413835 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153459336144 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721649269431 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.