The graph below gives the information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030.
The given line graph illustrates the major six categories of fuel consumption trend in US since 1980 along with their predictions till 2030.
Overall, petrol and oil is the major source of fuel followed by coal and natural gases. All the sources depict a positive prediction except for hydro power.
Petrol and oils have always been the major source of fuel in the US. Starting with 35 quadrillion in 1980, it follows a slight fluctuations in early years till 1995, with a gradual rise to 40 quadrillion in 2005. It is estimated to summit 50 quadrillion in 2030. Coal too shows a significant rise to 30 quadrillion usage in 2030 leaving behind the natural gases which had 20 quadrillion consumption compared to 15 quadrillion of coal in 1980. Undulating consumption pattern in natural gases were observed in early years with steady use of 25 quadrillion projected from 2015 to 2030.
Other energy sources like nuclear, solar/wind and hydro power had a minimum use of 4 quadrillion each in 1980. A seamless rise in nuclear and solar/wind sources was observed till 2010 with alike increment projected in following years attaining 6 and 5 quadrillion respectively in last year. However, the development in the hydro power sector is negative with a drop to 3 quadrillion till 2010 and no any sign of rise in consumption in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...h a drop to 3 quadrillion till 2010 and no any sign of rise in consumption in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93805309735 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87076426987 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548672566372 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8117686744 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171316994429 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701110788437 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622543330871 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108969914659 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742924457932 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.