The graph below given information from the 2008 report about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030.
The line graph illustrates the information about annual expenditure of energy in America under five different sources ( petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower) between 1980 and 2030 from a report 2008. Units are measured in quadrillion units.
Overall, when 2030, the necessity of hydropower will not be changed comparing in 1980. but, demand for the other five sources will be increased relatively.
In addition, In 1980, This year has been a major usage of power was petrol and oil. It was exactly 35 quadrillion units and also coal and natural gas were 20 quadrillions and approximately 17q so other expenditures were started nearest 4q in 1980.
Furthermore, petrol and oil have been exceeded other sources while hydropower will be the least consumption of energy. Coal and natural gas have been a plethora of fluctuation. but, will be relatively climbed when 2030 rather than in 1980. However, Nuclear power was gradually rose and no more any declining in the given period.
To sum up, petrol, coal and natural gas will be the main power sources while others will be minor sources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in America under five different sources petrol and oil, coal, natural gas, nucle...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... will not be changed comparing in 1980. but, demand for the other five sources will...
^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...as have been a plethora of fluctuation. but, will be relatively climbed when 2030 r...
^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...0. However, Nuclear power was gradually rose and no more any declining in the given ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10326086957 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70741102031 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.0270114206 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3636363636 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137879940203 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514594403462 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737126713196 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822882915756 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848161348522 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.