The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph illustrates the information about the diffusion of carbon dioxide by per person comparing between four different countries; United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, It is obvious that, The enormous amount of gas emitted by the British community. While Portugal seems to be quite low in the discharge of carbon dioxide.
Starting with the United Kingdom the emission rate is quite higher than other countries which were 11metric tonnes at initial period of time. Thereafter, It remained unchanged until 1977. Then, gradually decreased by around 2 metric tonnes in 2007. Whereas, about 8 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide thrown away by Sweden public in 1967. Further reaching more than than10 metric tonnes in 1977. Then plummeted about 7 metric tonnes. Thereafter, This retrogression remained continues approaching 5 metric tonnes in the last period of time.
On the other hand, Portugal community produced only 1 metric ton of gas in 1967. Nevertheless, Production of carbon dioxide gradually grew almost 6 tonnes in 2007. Whereas, Initially people of Italy produced doubled compare to Portugal. Then, This trend fluctuated till 1987. After remained unchanged.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. Overall, It is obvious that, The enormou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f gas emitted by the British community. While Portugal seems to be quite low in the d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow in the discharge of carbon dioxide. Starting with the United Kingdom the emi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries which were 11metric tonnes at initial period of time. Thereafter, It r...
^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... which were 11metric tonnes at initial period of time. Thereafter, It remained unchanged unti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ased by around 2 metric tonnes in 2007. Whereas, about 8 metric tonnes of carbon dioxid...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...e thrown away by Sweden public in 1967. Further reaching more than than10 metric tonnes...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...approaching 5 metric tonnes in the last period of time. On the other hand, Po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ric tonnes in the last period of time. On the other hand, Portugal community pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gradually grew almost 6 tonnes in 2007. Whereas, Initially people of Italy produced dou...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... Then, This trend fluctuated till 1987. After remained unchanged.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43386243386 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6461903868 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640211640212 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4859028857 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4666666667 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184982454178 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530999172836 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787199404748 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129901778555 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102541021291 0.0819641961636 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.