The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph depicts the information about the emission of carbon dioxide (Co2) by each individual averagely in the four nations - Sweden, united kingdom, portugal, italy from 1962 to 2007. Units are measured in metric tonnes.

Overall , it can be inferred that the emission of carbon dioxide in italy and Portugal witnessed an upward trend. While, the downward trend has been shown in united kingdom.

With regards to , Italy and portugal carbon dioxide was around 4 metric tonnes and below 2 metric tonnes respectively, in 1967. While, in italy it increased significantly and reached approximately to 6 metric tonnes and remained constant in the next decades. Likewise, Portugal carbon dioxide inclined dramatically till 1997 above 4 metric tonnes till 1997 amd remained oscillate till 2007.

On the other hand, the carbon level in united kingdom was marginally above then 10 metric tonnes and then it declined swiftly during last decade below 8 metric tonnes. Furthermore, in sweden that was produced around 4 metric tonnes and then, soar drastically to 6 metric tonnes in 1967 to 1977 and sharply fallen below 6 metric tonnes till the end.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re measured in metric tonnes. Overall , it can be inferred that the emission of...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and Portugal witnessed an upward trend. While, the downward trend has been shown in u...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wn in united kingdom. With regards to , Italy and portugal carbon dioxide was a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, likewise, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19251336898 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60034623733 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.616554386 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207375304848 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099614613844 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770804641019 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151394126438 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749100905769 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.