The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line chart illustrates average carbon dioxide (CO2) produced per person in four countries (United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal) over the 30 years (1967 to 2007). Units were measured in CO2 emissions in metric tonnes.
Overall, the trend of CO2 emissions in United Kingdom and Sweden decreased over the period given, while there was an increase in the Co2 emissions in Italy and Portugal. The British produced the most CO2, Portugal, on the other hand, emitted the least CO2 per person.
The CO2 emissions in United Kingdom decreased gradually from approximately 11 metric tones in 1967 to about 9 metric tones in 2007. In addition, the amounts of CO2 emission in Sweden went up sharply, peaked at 10 metric tonnes in 1977 and then decreased to 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
Italy and Portugal are the two countries which experienced CO2 emissions going up throughout the period given. The amount of CO2 emissions started at 1 metric tonne in Portugal and then increased all the all to the peak at 5 metric tonnes. Likewise, the CO2 emissions trend in Italy began at 4 metric tonnes and slowly went up to about 8 in 2007.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving collage in 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80512820513 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49016474296 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4967345028 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39026054741 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186512904126 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989912645057 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274804262334 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113440414564 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.