The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph below illustrates the change of carbon dioxide emissions per person in 4 countries namely united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. It can be clearly seen from the graph that there were similar upward trends in the Portugal and italy while united kingdom and Sweden had similar downward trends during this period of time.
According to the graph, the average carbon dioxide emissions per resident in UK stood at approximately 11 tonnes in 1967, far more than Sweden ( just over 8 metric tonnes) and this figure declined slightly to about 9 metric tonnes in 2007. In addition, the number of carbon dioxide per person in Sweden hit the peak of 10 metric tonnes in 1977 before dropping significantly to under 6 million tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, between 1967 and 2007 saw an dramatical rise in the average carbon dioxide in both italy and Portugal. There was a sharp increase in the carbon dioxide number per resident in italy from 4 metric tonnes to just below of 8 metric tonnes and the figure of italy was almost twice as many as the figure of Portugal during 40 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taly while united kingdom and Sweden had similar downward trends during this peri...
^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ad similar downward trends during this period of time. According to the graph, the average...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 11 tonnes in 1967, far more than Sweden just over 8 metric tonnes and this figur...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... By contrast, between 1967 and 2007 saw an dramatical rise in the average carbon d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73056994819 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3384011524 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.6106171121 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.166666667 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321134658257 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190294859621 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100718931427 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227841025907 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428624604432 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.