The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the average amount of carbon dioxide discharged by each person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, while the average CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom and Sweden showed downward trends, the sectors of Italy and Portugal rose dramatically.
Started at well over 10 tonnes in 1967, the mean carbon dioxide emitted per one American person was the highest in comparison with other countries. This figure then experienced a steady decrease by 2 tonnes in 2007, however, it still was the predominance among the four countries. The average carbon dioxide emissions per person in Sweden, which ranked second in 1967 with over 8 tonnes, after hitting the highest point at about 10 tonnes in 1977, dramatically declined to under 6 tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, the amount of CO2 released by each person in average of both Italy and Portugal witnessed a steep growth. Started at about 4 tonnes and slightly under 2 tonnes in 1967, the CO2 emissions by person in Italy and Portugal respectively increased to nearly 8 tonnes and well over 4 tonnes in 1997. The sector of Italy then leveled off until 2007 whereas the figure for Portugal mildly rose and met that of Sweden at under 6 tonnes in 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, then, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8779342723 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53109559862 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49765258216 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8202951025 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308992767904 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154539768541 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807859582827 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216771798931 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661450226211 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.