The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph explains data about the average number of carbon dioxide emissions per person in metric tonnes in the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, and Portugal over 40 years between 1967 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the United Kingdom made the highest contribution at the beginning of the period. Although there were some ebbs and flows seen in the mid-period, all the nations had followed an upward trend, while Sweden had only followed a downward trend at the end of the period.
In detail, it is noticeable that the average number of gases occurring in the country UK was about 12 metric tonnes. It was stable at that start, but then a gradual fall seen at the end of 2007. Though the Sweden nation had made a value of about eight metric tonnes, there was a sudden hike seen in 1977. However, the count dropped close to 6 metric tonnes in 2007.
The mean value of carbon dioxide emissions produced by one person in Italy was nearly four metric tonnes in 1967. Meanwhile, a drastic upsurge seen in the next decade, followed by the next 30 years reached a value of 8 metric tonnes. CO2 produced from the Portuguese pupil followed a gradual rise from the initial to the end of the period which counted for nearly six metric tonnes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61261261261 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23828099078 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536036036036 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5408436025 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246368346504 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101654027443 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154949857581 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186223106231 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196143127383 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.