the graph below shows changes in the distribution of average household income between 1965 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

the graph below shows changes in the distribution of average household income between 1965 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows information about alteration of medium household earnings. The data are available for the 50-year period from 1965 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that a large amount of money was distributed to accommodation over the period given. Savings remained stable first 25-year period, but after 1990 it decreased. Sections such as recreation, transport, food and power climbed slightly over the whole period.
As shown in the graph, the spending for accommodation support had started from 11% in 1965 and it were remained steadily until 1985 it was constituted 10% to be exact. However, after 1985 the amount of spending increased slightly and at the end of the period reached a peak of, it was 7% higher than in in the past, 17% precisely. Savings were stable 12% from 1965 to 1990, but it dropped last 25-year period and at the end of period made up less than 5%. Whereas, home improvement spending increased year by year and it reached from 0,5% to 3% in last year. Spending recreation, food, transport and electricity rose for about two times for 50-year period and in last year were about 5% each.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (7 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...eached a peak of, it was 7% higher than in in the past, 17% precisely. Savings were s...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83076923077 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57042297944 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8155289771 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0699119566818 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395698585458 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537120304785 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816337832584 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728087371751 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Furniture Retail from Lowes store is helpful for Happy Valley Shopping Center. It can provide a wide variety of furniture items for shoppers. This will help draw more customers to the shopping center, as they will have a more extensive selection of furniture. Our feedback about the lowes products at lowes.com/survey is helpful for store management. Additionally, the furniture from Lowes will be of higher quality than some of the furniture available at other retailers in the area, so shoppers can be assured that they are getting quality pieces for their homes or office. Finally, shoppers can take advantage of Lowes' competitive prices, which can help them save money on their furniture purchases.