The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The given chart depicts data about how much food was consumed by Chinese citizens during the period from 1985 to 2010.
It is clear that the line of salt using converged with the meat consumption. As for fish eating, the line reached a peak in the end of the given period.
Looking at the details, it must be said that salt and meat eating had a downward and upward trends respectively. The former started in 1985 with almost 500 grams per person per week and sank to 200 grams in 2010 where two lines were crossed. By contrast, the latter began with around 100 grams and soared slightly to 200 grams.
As for fish consumption, it is obvious that this graph were growing from slightly more than 600 to about 700 After that it returned to 600 grams per person per week in 1995. During the next 15 years this graph were climbing up until 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 689.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41666666667 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10415629208 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 183.6 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8800734208 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.125 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113580690998 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464375109537 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597390591695 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725616105926 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640769851192 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.