The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The linechar delineates the consumption of the food in china during the time period of 1985 to 2010. There are mainly three food represent in the graph which is Meat, Salt and Fish. The food consumption represent in person per grams in every week.
First of all the careful scrutiny of the graph reveals that the in 1985 almost 600 grams fish was eaten by per person. Same as Meat consumption was about 100 grams and Salt consumption was below the 500 grams. In the next 35 years period meat consumption was gradually increased about 100 grams, whereas salt consumption was plunge down about 300 grams.
Furthermore, The Chinese people fish consumption was not steady, at each 5 years there is a subtle varience. Albeit after 1995 chinense people fish consumption was constant augmented and reach almost 850 grams in 2010. In 2010 chinese people salt consumption was identical to the meet consumption.
Overall, The time period between 1985 to 2010 Chinese people was more dispositioned towards the meat and fish and less attracted about the salt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mption was plunge down about 300 grams. Furthermore, The Chinese people fish con...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fish and less attracted about the salt.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98305084746 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55489696149 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1803494813 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21008242861 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109109859416 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414546857572 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150916463115 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423005246916 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.