Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult. Others believe that it is getting easier. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
With advance facilities available in cities, a debate has developed whether living in urban area has more advantages or living in large cities has difficult for everyone because of the expensive in terms of economic and many other reason. Here, I will discuss both view and give my notion about this controversial topic. In addition, I firmly believe that former view has more points to prove my opinion.
There are manifolds points that shore up the first view. First and foremost, living in cities has a great benefits like, children would get excellent education, job perspective ratio is higher and many other reasons. Apart from that, tremendous transportation and medical services easily available in many big cities. For instance, city like New York and Delhi people easily travel to any region of the world because of international airport. Also, many veteran doctors and medical technology available hence, we can fight against disease better as compare to rustic area. Although, all urban area has no all facility, primarily services are ease to accessible from cities.
Moving for further, every coin has two side; living in cities have problems is not an exception. Since, many people are arriving in big cities, they get good job and try to true their dreams. Due to this population has been increasing and it would be difficult to handle the situation in urban areas. In order to this, poverty is constantly increasing also cities become more congested. Furthermore, in urban areas air deteriorate because of pollution and there is no available fresh air. Consequently, many disease are proliferate like asthma and cancer. therefore, we can say that living in cities would be also difficult.
In conclusion, living in cities has many pros and all services are easy to access but we can not shun the other side of this view. Many cons are also existing in this environment. so, people had better to consider both the views and take the decision. In my point of view living in big cities have more significance as compare to its down points. Because of routine life citizen would be become easy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ce, we can fight against disease better as compare to rustic area. Although, all u...
^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...stic area. Although, all urban area has no all facility, primarily services are ea...
^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'proliferated'.
Suggestion: proliferated
...esh air. Consequently, many disease are proliferate like asthma and cancer. therefore, we c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...are proliferate like asthma and cancer. therefore, we can say that living in cities would...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... are also existing in this environment. so, people had better to consider both the...
^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ificance as compare to its down points. Because of routine life citizen would be become...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tine life citizen would be become easy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01988636364 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61272062762 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553977272727 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2471121782 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1428571429 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7619047619 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282352528548 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769430579321 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617334051633 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185155747907 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731586860471 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.