Presented is the line graph illustrating how UK female parturition took place between 1973 and 2008. Overall, It is transparent from the chart that most children's birth women were usually popular in three periods of age (from 20 to 25, 25-29,30-35); The opposite was true for others groups.
The pregnancy rate was still much higher from 20 to 35 ages during the updated timescale. Although there were always the fluctuate percent of births at 25-29 periods, it was still the highest group compared with other groups. While 20-25 ages method was more soaring than 30-35 ages group in the first year of the timescale(1973), it put forward for different consideration in the following years that 20-25 ages had down uptrend and conversed with 30-35 ages from over 120% to near 90% and from around 70% to over 80% ( 1973-2008), respectively.
On the other hand, the rest of the groups had lower births rate for some reasons like health problems or age conditions, which made female challenging to have a baby at the beginning time of the time chart. However, the modern technology age was made easier than; as a result, the birth rate grew more than in 35-39 ages group from 40%(1973) to over 60% (2008). In addition, the percentage of the remaining two age groups (under20 and 40 and overages) showed signs of falling to the estimate of 20% and near 10% during 35 years, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d timescale. Although there were always the fluctuate percent of births at 25-29 periods, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...near 90% and from around 70% to over 80% 1973-2008, respectively. On the other h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79746835443 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54553153828 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603375527426 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1294225731 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.125 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34321521299 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14701632002 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569884627227 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237146933068 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169943956372 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.