The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph shows the consuming of fish, lamb, beef and chicken in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
During the so-called interval. The using of fish was fluctuated around 50 gram per person per week. On the other hand the applying of lamb and chicken was near in 1979, about 150 grams per person per week but with passing time first one was increased to 250 gram per person per week and second one was decreased to about 50 grams per person per week. Yet consumption beef had a different change, in fact while its usage was 200 gram per person per week firstly, then reached peak of 240 grams per person per week almost and then with a dropping rate its consumption arrived at 100 grams per person per week in 2004.
On the whole although using of beef was at the top list of fish and meat consumption in 1979, chicken went to the top list and beef was located at the second. On the other hand fish applying didn’t face dramatically change among the interval.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... using of fish was fluctuated around 50 gram per person per week. On the other hand ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ing time first one was increased to 250 gram per person per week and second one was ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 428, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...change, in fact while its usage was 200 gram per person per week firstly, then reach...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, while, in fact, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4469273743 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20846404593 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480446927374 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.8151513262 43.030603864 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13693180002 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095197879581 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125910347682 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185680280388 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149362142846 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.