The pie chart below show the main reason why agricultural land become less productive. The table show how these cause affected three regions of the world during 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart and table describe the reasons of destruction of farming land in three different areas in 1990s. Averagely over grazing has been known as a main cause of drop in productivity of agricultural land.
Over-grazing, over-cultivation- deforestation and other is introduced as a most important devastating parameters which decrease the beneficial of agriculture. First of all, Europe region suffer again 23% total land degraded, on the other hand, just 5% of agricultural land degraded in north America. Deforestation was the most significant cause of agricultural land demolishment in Europe by 9.8% and over-grazing by 11.3% introduced as a main reason in Oceania, while, Over-cultivation but had not any effect on agriculture productivity there. In North America over cultivation and deforestation had the most and the least effect respectively. Totally, apart from over-grazing, Europe had the most percentage of degradation by introduced variable, in comparing with other two areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...f farming land in three different areas in 1990s. Averagely over grazing has been known ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, apart from, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67333333333 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58778792882 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8993712155 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147830832427 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825264352504 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799593261259 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169976228207 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936353907839 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.