The graph below shows the consumption of the fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This graph illustrates the change in consumption of different types of meats in a European country during the period between 1979 and 2004.
In 1979, beef was the most popular of all types of meats, at a rate of around 220 grams/ person/ week. Both chicken and lamb were consumed at a nearly similar rate of about 150 grams/ person/ week.
During the following years between 1979 and 2004, beef and lamb consumption has fallen dramatically and reached around 100 and 55 grams respectively. Fish consumption also decreased but to a lesser extent and reached somewhat below 50 grams in 2004.
On the other hand, chicken consumption has risen significantly during the mentioned period of time to reach nearly 250 grams in 2004 which is even higher than the consumption of beef in 1979 and thus become the most popular of all types of meat in 2004.
In conclusion, fish and meat consumption in that European country has changed clearly during the 25-year period between 1979 and 2004 where chicken’s consumption has risen while the consumption of other types like beef, lamb and less significantly fish has decreased showing that meat consumption can vary from one time to another.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uring the period between 1979 and 2004. In 1979, beef was the most popular of al...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rate of about 150 grams/ person/ week. During the following years between 1979 ...
^^
Line 1, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eached somewhat below 50 grams in 2004. On the other hand, chicken consumption h...
^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...isen significantly during the mentioned period of time to reach nearly 250 grams in 2004 which...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.015 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73210084001 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4792014326 43.030603864 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.285714286 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266714126884 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140688180025 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108541253618 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199289311732 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624325842979 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.