The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meatin a European country between 1979 and 2004

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat
in a European country between 1979 and 2004

The line chart provided illustrates how many grams of four different type of meats ware consumed by people in Europe nation per week from 1979 to 2004. Overall, it is evident that the consuming of chicken saw an increase during the period, meanwhile three other kind of meats (beef, lamb, and fish) experienced downward trend.

Generally, chicken was not popular meat consumed by European people in initial year. it was stood at around 140 in 1979. this number was much smaller compare to meat from cow and sheep. however, the figure increased steadily in a decade and surpassed the number of eaten-beef in 1998 (approximately 210). Afterward, the trend fluctuated before it reached the highest figure at around 260, and ending the period with 250 grams.

Even though beef started the period as the highest number of eaten-meat (approximately 220). The figure witnessed fluctuation between 1979 and 1984. In the next three years (1985 – 1987) beef consumption was flat at around 235 grams. Following that, the consumption of beef decreased dramatically to about 100 grams at the end of reported year. Furthermore, lamb consumption stood at 150 gram in 1979. however, this figure inclined twofold at the end of the reported year. meanwhile fish consumption stood at 60 gram in early reported year and slightly change during the period.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...uring the period, meanwhile three other kind of meats beef, lamb, and fish experienc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...med by European people in initial year. it was stood at around 140 in 1979. this n...
^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ar. it was stood at around 140 in 1979. this number was much smaller compare to meat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ler compare to meat from cow and sheep. however, the figure increased steadily in a dec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...thermore, lamb consumption stood at 150 gram in 1979. however, this figure inclined...
^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...consumption stood at 150 gram in 1979. however, this figure inclined twofold at the en...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...wofold at the end of the reported year. meanwhile fish consumption stood at 60 gram in ea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: meanwhile,
...wofold at the end of the reported year. meanwhile fish consumption stood at 60 gram in ea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... meanwhile fish consumption stood at 60 gram in early reported year and slightly cha...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61531961607 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595454545455 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8978872245 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6428571429 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121021157921 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046570083002 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420054954403 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829327710657 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350345811915 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.