The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given graph displays diverse sources of air pollutants in the UK between 1990 and 2005.

In general, statistics are measured in million tons and have four items- total, industry, household and transport. Almost all indicators showed considerable decline in figures.

As it can be seen from the graph, total air pollution has the highest indicators: there was a sharp decrease from 7 million to 4 million tonnes between 1990-1999. After that, by 2005 there was observed a slight decline from 4 to 3.2 million tonnes. Similarly, industry hit the point of 5.5 million in 1990. In the interval of 1993-1996 there was a sharp drop from 5 million down to 3 million. Numbers stayed almost stable during 1996-2005, at the lattest falling down to the point of 2 million.

The most constant statistics were revealed by household air pollution. During all the given period of time it had insignificant fluctuations, but still not going over the mark of 1 million. Transport air pollution demonstrated the similar results with similar fluctuations, reaching its bottom at the point of 0.3 million in 2005.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... In general, statistics are measured in million tons and have four items- total, indust...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...old air pollution. During all the given period of time it had insignificant fluctuations, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, still, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08241758242 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82546363933 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620879120879 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2507851141 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172888921765 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747666079955 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847495516919 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131398198891 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107365177628 0.0819641961636 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.