The presented graph gives information on the amount of tourists visiting Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Overall, all criteria's indicators -visitors, staying on cruise ships, those staying on island and the total number of all the visitors- have increased in 2017, while in 2010 they were at noticeable low point.
Figures of quantity of visitors, staying on cruise eships showed both upward and downward trends, fluctuating during the period between 2010-2013. In 2010 and 2012, statistics were similar: reaching the point of 0,25 millions of visitors, whilst in 2011 and 2013 it was 0,5 millions.Starting from 2013 till to 2017, there was 0,5-million increase each year, and in 2017 it made up 2 millions of visitors.
According to the graph, in comparison with foregoing figures, the statistics of tourists that stayed on island, in given period of 2010-2011, stayed constant at the point of 0.75 millions. There was a half-million growth in data in 2012. Then there was a slight development in 2013, and until 2015 figures remained stable with 1,5 million. Data, regarding to amount of visitors, decreased to 1.25 million in 2016, and in 2017 it came back to previous indexes.
As it is clear from the graph, the total number of all the visitors on island illustrated the greatest upgrowth. Whilst in 2010 it was only 1 million, in 2011-2012 it gained another 0.5 million. In an interval of 2012 to 2014, each year the information gathered 0.5 million. After upward growth from 2.5 to 2.75 million in 2014-2015, the data stayed unchanged during 2015-2016. Conversely, there was dramatic increase in numbers in 2017- amount of visitors growed sharply from 2.75 to 3.5 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '25 million'.
Suggestion: 25 million
...s were similar: reaching the point of 0,25 millions of visitors, whilst in 2011 and 2013 it wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Starting
...st in 2011 and 2013 it was 0,5 millions.Starting from 2013 till to 2017, there was 0,5-m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...rease each year, and in 2017 it made up 2 millions of visitors. According to the graph, in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11870503597 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74055633672 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543165467626 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5040379148 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.461538462 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17407521693 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784660796144 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998822210295 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147475699926 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124063541741 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.