The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
This chart illustrates the number of questionnaires received by tourism centers using different mediums(Person, letter/email, telephone) in a city from January to June in 2011.
In overall, personal reporting is a more popular medium to access information than others, but its use was minimal previously. Emails/ Letters reduces its effectiveness and is an uncommon method for achieving details.
Whereas accessing information through the telephone is most popular and about 900 queries are received in January 2011 but reduce its count by 100 next month. In March, improved its uses to 1000 and steady till April, at the end of June popularity ranked in second with 1600 questions.
Again, Post mail or web mail is ranked second common approaches in January, though constant reduction till march drops up to nearly 650 enquiries, for next two months rapid deduction makes query level less than 400. while it remains constant for next month, It is marked lowest popular approaches in the end.
Even personal communications are uninterested approach in January with a dominant count of just more than 400, but its popularity grows in rapid and become must prefer in the end with 1900 queries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...y 2011 but reduce its count by 100 next month. In March, improved its uses to 1000 an...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...uction makes query level less than 400. while it remains constant for next month, It ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'marked the lowest'.
Suggestion: marked the lowest
... remains constant for next month, It is marked lowest popular approaches in the end. Even ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26041666667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83024878054 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661458333333 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4877856415 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934024627721 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447149832648 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519094281542 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557111853175 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473099388065 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.