The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line chart illustrates the six-month report of the inquiry number in the tourist information center in 2011. Overall, the figures for phone and personal inquiries increased during the period and, the face to face method accounted for the biggest number of tourist inquiries.
In the first month, the figure of phone inquiries was observed as the highest among the three. It stood at around 900 calls and, slightly decreased to about 800 in February. Following which, the number rose moderately in March, precisely a fourth that of in February and, remained unchanged in the following month (April). Then, the tourist inquiries figure significantly increased and, finished the period at almost two-fold that of the initial figure.
Face to face inquiries accounted as the lowest figure in the first month. It began just above 400 in january and, increased at around 100 per month in the next two month. Afterward, the figure was seen a substantial increase and, reached the peak number in june (around 1900). In addition, although the letter or email inquiries were in second place in january (accounted just below 800), the figure fell to more than a half in june.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01546391753 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50869992232 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4875384379 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158679250098 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716826444487 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731656224917 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126007553272 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065721580822 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.