The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribean island betwwn 2012 and 2017.
Summarise the information and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavent
The line graph below illustrates the tourist count (measured in millions) visiting a specific Caribbean Island for over 7 years from 2010 to 2017. The number of visitors is further divided into two categories, which are, Visitors staying on the island and Visitors staying on the cruise.
Overall, the total number of tourists has increased significantly over the years starting from 1 million in 2010 to 3.5 million in 2017. Initially, in 2010, the Visitors staying on island outnumber the Visitors staying on cruise, but towards the end in 2017, the trend is reversed.
The number of tourists who stayed on the island, rose slightly till 2012 (from approximately 0.75million to over 1 million), after which it had plateaued. From 2015 to 2017 a fluctuation can be seen. While, the visitor count on the cruise has climbed up steadily, reaching 2 million visitors in the year 2017.
The total number of tourists who took a trip to a Caribbean Island has gone up in a gradual trend. In the first five years (2010-2015), the visitor count has gone up slightly every year, after which in 2016 it had stabilized. From 2016 to 2017, there was dramatic increase of visitors by over 1 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the tourist count mea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87192118227 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62998831836 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1294430982 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142769353682 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712305596195 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050748561571 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10850631444 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317376653111 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.