The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The above line chart gives information about how many foreigners in scale of millions did visit one Caribbean island in a specific time period from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, it is clear that although a number of individuals who were fond of staying on cruise ships were increased, the demands for spending time on island were declined gradually. In total, the mentioned island witnessed a noticeable increase in its visitors per year.
Firstly, the amount of people who visited this place rose steadily from 1 to 3.5 million in 2010 and 2017 respectively. Similarity, the records for visitors who stayed on cruise ships had a roughly growth except in 2012 where its tourists reduced to 1.5 from 2 million in previous year. In 2017, it peaked with 2 million who spent most of their time on cruise ships.
On the other hand, statistic of spending time on island was fluctuated during this period. It grew to 1.5 million visitors in 2015 which was declined to 1.5 in 2016. Finally, it ended up the exact number of 1.5 million in the last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('roughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...visitors who stayed on cruise ships had a roughly growth except in 2012 where its tourists reduc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74725274725 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49479593604 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2403374392 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17028999585 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672902522039 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531216437447 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104918776737 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494397352299 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.