The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates a large quantity of travellers paying a visit to a particular Caribbean island over the course of 17 years, starting in 2010.
Overall, the island registered a significant upward trend in the number of visitors during the surveyed period. Another striking feature is that the figure for tourists staying on island contributed more greatly to the total number of visitors to the island than that on cruise ships.
The quantity of travellers to Caribbean island staying on ships starting under 0.5 millions of people increased slightly to 500 thousands of visitors from 2010 to 2011. However, one year later, there was a minimal reduction to 0,5 million in this figure. After that, it witnessed a sharp rise to over 1 million in 2015. In addition, while remaining unchanged at about a million of people during the first year, the number of visitors staying on the island went up remarkably to 1.5 million in 2013, and remained stable until 2015.
From 2016 to 2017, both the numbers of travellers staying on island and on cruise ships similarly reached their highest point at 1.5 million and 2 million, respectively. Besides, at the end of this period, the quantity of people staying on cruise ships was higher than that on island.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...sland staying on ships starting under 0.5 millions of people increased slightly to 500 thousa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '500 thousand'.
Suggestion: 500 thousand
...illions of people increased slightly to 500 thousands of visitors from 2010 to 2011. However, on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, similarly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96226415094 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59214315252 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542452830189 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7039645271 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156561860177 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694736804822 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582619885759 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113772015366 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521652405348 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.