The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main futures, and make comparisions where relevent.
The line graph illustrate the circumstantial Caribbean island the majoritiy of tourists visiting from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, between the seven years all visitors number dramatically increased but in this years visitors staying on cruise shirps significantly increased however visitors staying on island fluctuated slightly. Firstly, in 2010 the highest category visitors of total number equal one million after than this category suddenly increased between 2010 and 2017,from one million to approximately two and a half million. Secondly, visitors staying on cruise shirps and staying on island comparision their. First year visitors staying on cruise shirps this category improvement slightly about a quarter million to a half a million but visitors staying on island to remain static, after than from 2012 to 2017 visitors staying on cruise shirps dramatically increased and visitors staying on island fluctuated significantly but lastly one year visitiors of total number rose steply around from 2.75 million to 3 half million.
In conclusion, in this seven years in Caribbean the highest category visitors staying on cruise shirps was the lass category visitors staying on island.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rs number dramatically increased but in this years visitors staying on cruise shirps...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65921787709 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7890470476 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424581005587 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.722895534 43.030603864 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.833333333 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 5.23603664747 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121531481679 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997379168961 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830514023586 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137565032096 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102918612178 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.