The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The graph illustrates how many people visited an island in Caribbean from 2010 to 2017 and how many of them would stay on their ships or the island. Overall, the number of visitors coming to the island increased throughout the period.
Initially, the quantity of tourists at Caribbean island who preferred to stay on their ships was smaller than those who chose to stay on island. In the following year, these figures nearly met each other at about 0.6 visitors before turning into different directions. Between 2011 and 2015, a gradually increasing number was witnessed on people accommodating on island whereas cruise ships reached a low point at approximately 0.2 visitors before climbing dramatically.
Furthermore, between 2015 and 2016, there was a similarity in the number of tourists who either stayed on board or island, at just below 1.5 visitors. Afterwards, the option of having a stay on the island was not as much preferable as the other, at exactly 1.5 visitors and 2 visitors respectively. Despite that, the total number of people coming to visit the Caribbean island saw significant rise, beginning at 1 visitor in 2010 and finishing at 3.5 visitors in 2017.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07179487179 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79369064668 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574358974359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3757470031 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173512427826 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873356681175 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502887555699 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135828358131 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316622449822 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.