The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The data in the presented line graph depicts the number of university graduates passed out in Canada from the year 1992 to 2007.
The graph showed a comparison between the passed out males and females. It is conspicuous from the graph that the number of passed out female graduates were always ahead of the number of males.
Back in the year 1992, passed out females were around 99,000. The number of females showed a gradual increase to around 104,000, till the year 1995. Whereas, after 1995 it showed a trough till 2000, ending at the same from where started around 104,000. After this year, there was a dramatic increase in the numbers of female graduates, numbers reaching as high as 147,000, at the end of the given period.
In contrast to this, the number of male graduates were much lower. They were around 72,000, in the year 1992, and then showed little ups and downs till 1998, but numbers were stilll the same at the end. After 1998, the male graduates showed a little increase in numbers till 2000, upto 74,000. Then, at the end of the period, the number of male graduates also experienced a steep in increase in the graph, reaching as high as 96,000, in the year 2006.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, then, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64928909953 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18888604543 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450236966825 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5997515581 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1818181818 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221637773566 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111946439769 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706492231756 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185023054254 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787682350889 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.