The graph below shows the perceived danger and actually likelihood of being a victim of crime.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrate the recognized situation and real change of something happening of being a preyed upon of offense against the law.
Overall, Perceive 2009/10 at burglary avarage persentage but this persentage at car crime sharply increased and violent crime equal to the burglary. On the other hand actual 2009/10 just under a quarter however this persentage at car crime well over and equal to burglary respectivrly.
Firstly, the highest category the 9% but this persentage at burglary to 16%, at car crime this persentage rose steeply to 22% and at violent crime equal 13%. The actual 2009/10 at burglary this persentage alike 2% and actual category in 2010 and 2011 slightly variation to 3%. But car crime and violent crime this both category actual 2009/10 and 2010/1011 to reman the same 4% and 3% respectively.
Finally perceived 2010 and 2011 years this section at the burglary and violent crime their allotment equal to each others about 13%. However at the car crime this years improved considerably to 16%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rime sharply increased and violent crime equal to the burglary. On the other hand...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. Firstly, the highest category the 9% but this persentage at burglary to 16...
^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 22% and at violent crime equal 13%. The actual 2009/10 at burglary this persenta...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...an the same 4% and 3% respectively. Finally perceived 2010 and 2011 years this sect...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...lotment equal to each others about 13%. However at the car crime this years improved co...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ers about 13%. However at the car crime this years improved considerably to 16%.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09411764706 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59627094837 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488235294118 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5468336153 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914071520374 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559408705439 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185482026863 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613373095807 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192845597144 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.