The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
The bar graph above illustrates the comparison of the percentage of people working part-time during the year 1980 and 2010 in four countries of United Kingdom. As seen from the graph, the number of hard-working citizens is more in Wales in both the years. Also, the number of part-time workers has kept increasing in England, Scotland, and Wales from 1980 to 2010. Whereas, Northern Ireland is the only country where people have opted to not work additionally from their full-time jobs in 2010 compared to 1980.
In the beginning, the highest positive difference of percentage (nearly 9%) between 1980 and 2010 is in Scotland. Following this, the lowest negative difference (around 2%) is noted in Northern Ireland. Furthermore, the percentage of part-time workers in Wales is greater than 30% in both the years. Also, it is less than 20% in Northern Island and Scotland during both years.
Finally, it is noted that the highest percentage of part-time workers is approximately 34% in Wales in the year 2010 and lowest percentage of part-time workers is almost 12% in Scotland in the year 1980.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... Scotland, and Wales from 1980 to 2010. Whereas, Northern Ireland is the only country w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00549450549 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73052600239 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489010989011 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8787288315 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406742357899 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171563328495 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137768925623 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288626559809 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933445047649 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.