The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of people in 2003, 2005 and 2007 who went to the cinema from Monday to Sunday in a certain European country.
Overall, In all the years, the greatest percentage of people visited the cinema on Saturdays, furthermore, more people went to the cinema during weekends than weekdays.
In 2003, nearly 40% of people visited the cinema on Saturday, this number increased slightly to about 45% in 2005, before declining marginally to approximately 42%. Similarly, on Sunday exactly 30% visited the place, which also rose to around 34% and dropped slowly to about 32%. However, an equal percentage of people visited the cinema on Fridays, which stood at 30%.
On the contrary, on Mondays, only 10% of people were in the cinema in 2003, however the figure doubled on Tuesday to 20%, fell slightly to just over 15% on Wednesday, before rising considerably to around 23% on Thursday. On Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays in 2005, the percentage of people who visited the cinema remained unchanged at about 13%. This is similar to Tuesdays and Thursdays in 2007 when about 18% was seen there, this figure reduced on Mondays and Wednesdays to around 13 and 8 percent respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...place, which also rose to around 34% and dropped slowly to about 32%. However, an...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... slightly to just over 15% on Wednesday, before rising considerably to around 23%...
^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r to Tuesdays and Thursdays in 2007 when about 18% was seen there, this figure re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, similarly, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02475247525 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67437179238 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539603960396 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.762415177 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123317361876 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642160978398 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453410745705 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882246827843 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274469713888 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.