The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The graph compares the rate of people going to a movie theatre on different days of a week in the years 2003, 2005 and 2007.
Overall, the number of people going to a theatre on weekends is higher than the weekdays. All days saw a fluctuated trend with Monday, Saturday and Sunday experienced an upward trend, while Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday saw a downward trend. Friday numbers are constant in all the years.
In 2003 ,10% of people visited movie theatres on Monday, which is lowest of all the days in the year, while 40% of people watched a movie outside on Saturdays which is the highest of the year. Sunday movie watchers contributed to 30% in 2003. Despite improvement in the number of film watchers on Monday, Saturday and Sunday to just under 15%, 45% and around 35%, respectively in 2005 the figures went down at the end of the period.
On the other side, Wednesday theatre visitors are around 15% in 2003 and declined steadily to just under 10% by 2007. Tuesdays and Thursdays have followed the same trend with a decline in the figures at the end. In contrast, Friday cinema visitors remained stable in all the years with 30%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... constant in all the years. In 2003 ,10% of people visited movie theatres on ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69950738916 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3886597409 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512315270936 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6738361716 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0647959088619 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296185027458 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345187505457 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513744896609 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352578493488 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.