Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement.
There is a belief that government should allocate budget on railways not on roads. Although, I agree that spending on railways should continue, it would however be important not to discontinue budgeting on roads.
To begin, because of the safe nature of railway, it is without doubt that money should be spent to maintain it by the government. This is because, train is a form of transport with minimal accident rate owing to the fact that they are without traffic congestion since one train apply on a rail at a given time. Furthermore, pollution is another factor to consider. The environment agency have concluded that train constitute lesser air pollution than any other mode of transportation as they are fewer and built with cleaner burning engine. Finally, the fact that lives would be saved and pollution minimized spurs government not to cut expenses on railways.
However, not allocating finance on roads would mean that in the long run there would be no alternative mode of transporting people from one place to another since they would become dilapidated for lack of maintenance. Not everyone prefer travelling by rail, meanwhile, it is undoubtedly that most people consider privacy and convenience of much importance which answers the question why they would always travel by road. Train cannot also effectively be built in every areas for commuters, as a result, farmers would always consider road their major means of conveying goods because it is cost effective. Improving the state of roads by ensuring that government agencies receive capital would therefore grant the public another medium of transport.
In conclusion, government spending on railways should continue for safety reasons and its eco-friendly nature; however expenses on road should as well not be cut in order for citizens to have their choice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, so, therefore, well, while, as for, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21959459459 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76819096323 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0461092579 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150620669849 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689739102874 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786359150834 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125291814142 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928055421969 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.