the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030
The line graph compares the proportion of urban population in four countries namely the USA, Korea, China, and India from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, the percentage of population living in cities increases in each country between 1970 and 2030. The USA is predicted to see the largest percentage of urban population in all periods shown.
In 1970, 70% American population lived in cities, while the figures for Korea, China and India were much lower, at 40%, about 21%, and 20% respectively. From 1970 to 2010, the USA and India saw a slight rise in the percentage of urban population, a rise of under 20% in 50 years, compared to a sharp increase of over 40% in Korea and China.
Until the year 2030, the proportion of the population in cities in the USA is expected to rise to 90%. Similarly, the figures for Korea, China and India will go up to nearly 90%, 65%, and 38% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | dataimielts | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | thanhzjzj | 82 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | adamneyul | 42 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | thiên định | view | |
| 2020-05-11 | thiên định | view |
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 71
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- What are the causes of water shortages Please also offer some solutions to this problem Give some reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65605095541 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58303618757 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3008813932 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166929418672 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992637184006 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756414479375 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124178330924 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664140675235 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.