The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows how the population in three countries in the state of oregon in the USA changed between 1940 and 2000. Overall, washington had far higher population than columbia and yamhill and the population growth between 1980 and 2000 was considerably higher.
In 1940, the population of columbia was around 28 thousand, the lowest among the three counties in the oregon state. yamhill had a population of 30 thousand while washington had 75 thousand inhabitants, the highest among these counties.
By 1970, yamhill’s population increased by 50% while columbia witnessed about 40% population increase during the last three decades. At that time, washington’s population reached to nearly 125 thousand which was somewhat double than the population of yamhill and columbia together in this year.
Finally, in 2000, columbia and yamhill accommodated roughly 90 and 80 thousand citizens, a noticeable growth than that of the last three decades. In this year, washington’s population reached to approximately 250 thousand, more than double than that of 1970’s.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yamhill
...the three counties in the oregon state. yamhill had a population of 30 thousand while w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60240963855 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13496198468 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.9040089286 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195371711677 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11760550643 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119695912897 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140255299541 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096070694651 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.