The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the trends of population in three counties in America of Oregon (namely columbia, yamhill and washington) from 1940 to 2000.
In general, between 1940 and 2000, the number of citizens in these three counties were all in the ascendant. washington had the largest population during the period in question while columbia had the smallest.
As can be seen from the graph, in 1940, washington’s population, 75,000 people, was approximately twice of columbia and yamhill. it had dramatically increased to more than 120,000 people by 1970, before an exponential growth from 1970 to 2000 with nearly 120,000 people increases.
Compared to washington, columbia and yamhill’s population is considerably lower than it. Both columbia and yamhill had around 30,000 people in 1940, while yamhill was slightly higher than columbia. 30 years later, the growth rate of yamhill was marginally steeper than columbia, whereas they witnessed the similar changes from 1970 to 2000 with experiencing the number increase of 45,000 .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Washington
...ree counties were all in the ascendant. washington had the largest population during the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ximately twice of columbia and yamhill. it had dramatically increased to more than...
^^
Line 13, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...periencing the number increase of 45,000 .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5900621118 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95815582265 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1505918884 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13539730872 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767293829003 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748274372525 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116095879369 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075133700869 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.