The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Given line graph indicates the population growth since the year of 2000 in China and India and predicts how much it will grow until year of 2050. It is evident that the rate of fertility in India dramatically rose from year of 2000 and this trend will continue until the year of 2050. Moreover, the number of population in China increased marginally from the year of 2000 and will anticipate this trend will be continued until the year of 2025, subsequently, will experience an decrease gradually until 2050.
Based on the information provided by graph the population growth in India was 1 billion in 2000, as it will be anticipated the population of both countries reach over 1.4 billion equally in 2030. The UN has predicted total number of citizens will climb until 2050 with population of 1.6 billion.
Even though, the total population of China was incredibly more in comparison with India at the first point of the graph in year of 2000, the UN believes this population will reach of peak over 1.4 billion in the early of 30s and then slightly will fall, as the population will get somewhere in vicinity of 1.4 billion in 2050.
Generally, If I want to make a conclusion, according to provided graphs both territories will see the rate of birth between 2000 and 2025, but predictions say that it will be stopped for China in 2030 and India still dramatically ascend the total number of its citizen until 2050; population distance between two country probably will get reach by 200 million.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... of 2025, subsequently, will experience an decrease gradually until 2050. Based o...
^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...probably will get reach by 200 million.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77307692308 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60600978169 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476923076923 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0599712681 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 177.285714286 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1428571429 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343472302058 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213049718434 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751201678946 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235380829599 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047464404273 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.